Free Speech in Modern Western and Muslim Perspectives: Unraveling Common Grounds and Divergences

Abstract

This article aims to examine the notion of free speech by delving into perspectives from both Western and Muslim standpoints, highlighting commonalities and differences between the two. It highlights the centrality of free speech in Western societies, tracing its evolution from ancient concepts to its modern implications, influencing movements like reformation, revolutions, and the development of democratic principles. In the context of Muslim societies, the article addresses the relevance of free speech to blasphemy laws, scrutinizing the differences in understanding between the two viewpoints. The article critically answers key questions regarding the ancient and modern meanings of freedom, the Muslim perspective on freedom, the necessity of protecting free speech constitutionally, and the limitations or absoluteness of this concept. It explores the effectiveness of Western approaches in limiting free speech and contrasts them with Muslim approaches. The author adopts a critical and analytical approach, drawing from Western intellectual sources. In conclusion, the article posits that the modern notion of free speech emerged through Renaissance humanism and emphasizes the four argument theory supporting its necessity. It contends that free speech is not an absolute right and argues for the universality of revelation as a guiding principle. The article calls for urgent consideration, especially by Muslim scholars, using rational approaches appreciated by both Muslim and non-Muslim scholars alike